I was hugely disappointed to learn that Aspen no longer seams interested in being viewed as a leader in carbon reduction. The City has just adopted, what is, in my opinion, a relaxed version of the International Energy Conservation Code. The Building Department asked me for data. So I went through 140 different blower door tests and HERS Ratings I had on file to get a feeling for how our new construction is looking. Summary of data below…
|location||number of tests||number of tests over 3 ACH50||ACH50 average||ACH50 low||ACH50 High|
|City of Aspen||49||26||3.4||1.26||7.08|
|Town of Carbondale||26||13||3.06||1.16||5.8|
In terms of HERS Ratings- RESNET says the national average score is 61. Colorado had 12,320 (of 206,583) rated homes last year, with an average score of 55. Remember that lower is better when talking about HERS Ratings. Our average HERS Rating score in the Roaring Fork Valley over the past seven years is a 56. So Colorado is better than average nation wide, but the Roaring Fork Valley is behind the state average. Summary of HERS data below…
|Number of Ratings in 2016||Average HERS Index in 2016|
|District of Columbia||337||59|
Below is a letter sent to the Aspen City Council…
Aspen City Council members,
I intended to speak at the meeting of January 10th but was misinformed about the time and therefore arrived too late. My intention was to recommend denial of the proposed adoption of the 2015 International Energy Conservation Code as amended by the Community Development Department. My preference would be to see the document adopted as written.
My firm, Confluence, has been providing architectural services in the valley for nearly seventeen years. In 2010 the firm began offering energy code compliance services; energy modeling and building testing.
Aspen has adopted a heavily modified version of the code. One that deletes some important tenets of this latest version of the International Building Code. For instance, the requirement for mandatory air infiltration testing has been removed. My professional opinion is that these tests are a valuable check on the condition of the barrier between outside and inside. The data the we have compiled from our work in the valley shows that only about half of that new construction would have passed the 2015 code limits. Research shows us that air sealing is the single least expensive way to reduce the energy consumption of a building.
Aspen’s Climate Action Plan says the community has a goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 80% by 2050. Approximately 32% of Aspen’s emissions come from buildings. If the City were serious about making those goals, then why relax energy conservation building codes at all? Why would the City lowering the bar instead of ensuring that new construction complies with the same code that Pitkin County, the Town of Snowmass Village and Eagle County have adopted?
To me it sounds hypocritical for, Aspen, the home of CORE, the Canary Initiative, Z Green and AREday, not to be doing everything possible to make sure their new construction meets contemporary minimum construction standards.
Final point, it negates the benefits of having an International code system if every jurisdiction completely rewrites the content. It leads to increased confusion, time, money, and potential for mistakes. Why not standardize?
Architect & Sustainability Consultant